Other companies, including Meta and SNAP, have been washed and fell behind YouTube. These companies have also demanded the government of Australia to ban YouTube. In fact, the Australian government took a big step and banned using social media for children under the age of 16, but YouTube was kept out of it. Now the rest of the companies say that YouTube should also be banned for children under 16 years of age.
Why do the rest of the companies want to ban YouTube?
Meta and Snap etc. of tickets, Facebook and Instagram, Mata and Snap etc. say that due to YouTube, children are the same threats, which were from other social media platforms. YouTube also gives children access to algorithmic content recommendation, social interaction feature and dangerous content. Meta says that due to YouTube, children are also exposed to harmful content. Similarly, tickets say that by keeping YouTube out of this rule, this law has become anomalous. Snap has also agreed with this, saying that the law should be fair and it should be followed without any discrimination.
Why was you not banned on YouTube?
Australia passed a new law in November last year. Under this, children under 16 years of age cannot access social media platforms. If a platform allows them to log in, then a provision has been made to impose heavy fine on it. However, this law does not apply to YouTube. It has been excluded from the ban due to its educational content and family account with parental supervision. Reacting to the statements of other companies, YouTube said that its content is strengthening the moderation policy and identifying the harmful content through automated tools.
Also read-
Deepfek video is being shared in the name of SBI, bank alert, be careful
(Tagstotranslate) meta
Source link
